|
Post by zuolun on Nov 18, 2013 9:27:02 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Nov 18, 2013 12:09:03 GMT 7
SuntecReit — Bearish Rising Wedge breakout; interim TP S$1.48Dead cat bounce; Immediate support @ S$1.53, immediate resistance @ S$1.615. SuntecReit has a bullish harami trade done @ 1.59 (+0.025, +1.6%) at 9.32m shares done, trading bet. 1.575 to 1.595 on 18 Nov 2013 at 1.25pm.
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Nov 22, 2013 0:12:46 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Dec 6, 2013 14:22:14 GMT 7
SuntecReit — Bearish Falling Three Methods Pattern; interim TP S$1.48SuntecReit has a hammer @ 1.505 (-0.005, -0.3%), it hits low of 1.50 and high of 1.515 on 6 Dec 2013 at 3.20pm.
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Dec 8, 2013 8:37:18 GMT 7
pertama.freeforums.net/post/1663SuntecReit bottomed in early-Oct 2011 and peaked in mid-Apr 2013. The dividends yield (if bet. 7 - 10%) must be sufficient to cover the capital loss, which may accelerate further, going forward. Buying a strong uptrend stock after the last burst of fire bears the highest risk. SuntecReit is now on the correction sub-wave-(i) of wave-C down. SuntecReit (weekly) — The Elliott Wave pattern as at 6 Dec 2013 SuntecReit (weekly) — The Elliott Wave pattern as at 16 Aug 2013SuntecReit (weekly) — The Elliott Wave pattern as at 21 Jun 2013SuntecReit as at 21 Nov 2012
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Dec 10, 2013 14:39:02 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Dec 15, 2013 13:39:40 GMT 7
SuntecReit — Bearish Rising Wedge breakout; interim TP S$1.48Immediate resistance @ S$1.53, immediate support @ S$1.48, next support @ S$1.42. SuntecReit as at 15 Nov 2013
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Dec 29, 2013 22:39:46 GMT 7
SuntecReit — Descending triangle formation; crucial support @ S$1.42Immediate support @ S$1.48, immediate resistance @ S$1.58, the 100d SMA.
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Mar 24, 2014 7:37:26 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Oct 25, 2015 15:56:27 GMT 7
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Oct 29, 2015 11:29:04 GMT 7
SuntecReit: The "straw that breaks the camel's back" ~ In 2003, whistle-blower, Roland Poon's red alert on CHC in public was silenced. What caught the attention of the relevant authority of Singapore, prior to the CHC trial was that, in 2010, CHC borrowed S$45m to purchase 20% SuntecReit shares @ 8% interest and a year later in 2011, CHC's stake in SuntecReit increased to 39.2% The City Harvest Church Story (1986-2012)Unaccountability: There was no one strong enough to tell CHC to stop ~ 21 Oct 2015 Political reason why CHC faces financial irregularities’ charges? ~ 1 July 2012 Religious groups’ commercial deals and tax questionLester Lam 11 Mar 2010 I REFER to Sunday’s report, ‘City Harvest paying $310m to become Suntec co-owner’. While it is City Harvest Church’s right to decide how it spends its money, there are related issues which the Government should address. Religious organisations are registered charities. Therefore, contributions and income are non-taxable. However, with more and more religious organisations venturing into business and owning commercial properties, is their tax-exempt status still relevant? Should the Government continue to let religious organisations own commercial properties and earn income from rent? After all, the revenue these organisations use for the purchase is tax-exempt in the first place. Suntec City was developed for commercial purposes. With the church’s purchase of the development and its proposal to convert a section of the exhibition space for church use, is it in breach of the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s land-use policy? For years, New Creation Church has rented space in Suntec for church services on a commercial basis. However, now that City Harvest owns the space, and wants to convert some part of it into the church’s auditorium, is it legal? Besides Suntec, this issue is also a concern with the new civic and cultural centre at one-north, which is co-owned by New Creation Church. Land sales for religious purposes by the Government are on a 30-year lease. With some religious organisations acquiring land earmarked for other uses, with much longer leases, and using it for their religious purposes, is it fair to other religious organisations which must tender for 30-year lease land? Religious organisations obtain their funding from their congregations. However, some religious organisations, such as New Creation, and now City Harvest, own commercial properties which generate income for them.
|
|
|
Post by zuolun on Nov 30, 2015 8:36:00 GMT 7
|
|